[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-windows
Subject:    Re: Feedback from an application developer
From:       Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker () freenet ! de>
Date:       2009-08-21 19:35:30
Message-ID: 4A8EF702.5010504 () freenet ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Christian Ehrlicher schrieb:
> Thomas Friedrichsmeier schrieb:
>   
>> On Friday 21 August 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>>     
>>>> the freedom to set release cycles that are often much
>>>> shorter, and sometimes much longer than KDE's...
>>>>         
>>> This is not. There are tons of apps in KDE svn that have their own release
>>> cycle: amarok, k3b, koffice just to name a few prominent ones.
>>>       
>> Ok, true. But if the suggestion was to move that moving to KDE svn would have 
>> the benefit of more or less "automagic" package creation, then - all other 
>> issues aside - I don't see that happening on my own release schedule.
>>
>>     
> I don't see any reason why you have to should move to kdesvn to use the
> emerge infrastructure - or is emerge no longer able to checkout from
> anything which is not in kdesvn??
>   
no, after the refactoring it is even better to integrate outside 
repositories of different types :-)

Regards
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Kde-windows mailing list
Kde-windows@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-windows
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]