[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-utils-devel
Subject:    Re: Migrating to git
From:       Michael Leupold <lemma () confuego ! org>
Date:       2010-12-17 9:01:29
Message-ID: 4D0B26E9.4000904 () confuego ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Am 15.12.2010 04:07, schrieb Raphael Kubo da Costa:
> (Long message ahead)
>
> Hey there,
>
> #### What has been done so far ####
>
> As you might have noticed, I've recently started working on the
> conversion rules in preparation for moving kdeutils from SVN to git. I
> have started from scratch, as Johannes Obermayr did not answer any of
> those mails I sent him and CC'ed this list.
>    

Great! I'll check kwalletmanager's history asap.

> We (the kdeutils team) need to decide whether we want to keep a single
> repository (and history) for the whole module, or if we prefer to go
> with a split layout. In a few words, keeping a single history means
> there will be a "kdeutils" repository on git, and everyone will push
> to the same repository in a similar way to what is currently done, and
> choosing a split layout means the "kdeutils" module will only exist
> virtually in KDE's git repository, as there is actually going to be a
> single repository for Ark, a single one for KGpg, a single one for
> KRemoteControl, so on so forth.
>    

I'd go with a split layout as well. If there are no interdependencies 
(there are none for kwalletmanager) I don't see a big benefit for 
kdeutils to keep all apps together in a single repository. My preference 
isn't that strong though - if there are any objections I wouldn't mind a 
joint layout either.

Regards,
Michael
_______________________________________________
Kde-utils-devel mailing list
Kde-utils-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-utils-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]