The big wish is to be able to highlite a block of time in the diary ( eg=20
10-12 ) and then start typing in the area immediately to create a new=20
appointment for that time.=20

Currently you double click at the start time and have to set the end time=
=20
within the query.

This was mentioned by myself and others a few weeks back, I guess I need =
to=20
find out who and where the usability of Korganiser is going to be logged.


The way Evolution does it is much nicer.

I actually prefer Evolution because I like to have my virtual filofax ( i=
e=20
diary, contacts and email ), but Im not using it at the moment as I prefe=
r=20
kmail's formatting of email.

dids


> Had some feedback from the Cornelius the author of Korganizer. Can you =
help
> provide me some feedback on the user interface of the program if you ar=
e
> currently using it?
>
> If you aren't using it but are using something else instead (evolution?=
)
> can you let me know why you are currently not using korganizer ?
>
>
> Regards
> Stephen
>
> ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
>
> Subject: Re: Usability report for Korganizer
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:48:08 +0200
> From: Cornelius Schumacher <schumacher@kde.org>
> To: S A Jarrett-Sprague <sjarrettsprague@waitrose.com>
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Friday 17 August 2001 21:58, S A Jarrett-Sprague wrote:
> > I have just written a usability report for Korganizer 2.1 for KDE 2.1=
.2
> > and have volunteered to maintain the Korganizer usability report. Ple=
ase
> > find attached report.
>
> Ah great, this is something which could turn out to be very useful.
>
> > The approach I took with writing this report was to take a look at th=
e
> > program from a new users perspective and how they would guess the pro=
gram
> > should work primarily by just looking at it. I took MS Outlook to be =
the
> > baseline that people would compare to.
>
> Did you make any studies with other people using KOrganizer, or are the=
se
> just your personal experiences? I would be very interested in reports a=
bout
> people actually using KOrganizer and where the most common problems wit=
h
> the user interface are.
>
> > I think the things that I have commented on our pretty minor stuff th=
at
> > =A0if changed might help polish the program. Indeed korgainzer in KDE=
 2.2
> > may be much different allready. Can't wait to see! Anyway, I would
> > appreciate feedback, and any suggestions as how you would like the
> > usability project to help you.
>
> Some comments about the isssues you raise in the report:
>
> #1-1: 3-pane monthview/todo view: For the month view it's useful to hav=
e in
> addition the todo list, for the todo list is useful to have in addition=
 the
> small calendar. I'm not sure what the best solution is, but you are rig=
ht,
> that this isn't optimal right now. With the other two points I agree. W=
ill
> fix that, when I find time.
>
> #1-2: This is a bug in kdeui. This should be fixed.
>
> #1-3: This has been fixed in Korganizer 2.2
>
> #1-4: You are right. We are addressing this problem right now, with a n=
ew
> alarm daemon architecture.
>
> Regards,
> Cornelius
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability