On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > ok so here is first draft of version2: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/42123798@N03/4148978350/sizes/o/ > http://www.flickr.com/photos/42123798@N03/4148218997/sizes/o/ I think that looks good. I would advocate that the two options for widget glow and progress bars should be combined into one, but I think your dialog is a fine solution considering the string freeze. This also makes the "Tabs" tab look less empty. > > I guess I could, in the first screenshot, group the three options into > one "enable animations" > but then it would be strange to have the tab animations in a separate > tab, and on top of that it is unclear if unchecking "enable animations" > in the general tab should or should not also disable the "animate tab > transitions" checkbox. (I understood it is usually a bad idea to make > one widget state depend on another widget located in a different tab ...) Totally agree. I think the way you have it is great and clearly grouped. From 8 to 4 options, and one less tab! I hope this can get accepted, and thank you for your work! Leo _______________________________________________ kde-usability mailing list kde-usability@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability