[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: [kde-artists] A case for go-{first/previous/next/last} oxygen
From:       Jacob Beauregard <jrbeaure () uvm ! edu>
Date:       2007-05-05 16:17:37
Message-ID: 200705051217.37805.jrbeaure () uvm ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 04 May 2007 11:37:37 pm Neil wrote:
> On 05/02/2007 10:38 PM, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> >> James, The larger dot is not bad, although as I tried to explain,
> >> well-know VCR-like vertical lines would eliminate more problems than
> >>  the dot. In particular, as lon as you have all the 4 icons together
> >>  within the navigator, it's easy to guess what's the purpose of the
> >> 1st (.<) and 4th icon (>.). If you put icon like (>.) alone, it's
> >> harder to guess its purpose than (>|)
> >
> > Yes, if I wasn't 100% clear.  I would vote for the "|" (that is what I
> > have in my icon set).  However if they must have the dot, then it needs
> > to be larger.
>

Yep, gives more to consistency and familiarity than any of the other options 
that achieve equal or less visibility.

> I'm going to have to quickly toss in my vote for [ >| ] as well.  It
> makes logical sense, (the end is represented by the line, the arrow
> represents movement); and people are already used to it.
>
> Cheers.


_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]