From kde-usability Tue Nov 14 10:36:54 2006 From: David Roberts Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:36:54 +0000 To: kde-usability Subject: Re: A different approach to kmails's filter-dialogue Message-Id: <200611142036.54837.dvdr18 () gmail ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-usability&m=116350105913561 Yes, the current dialog is a little confusing/hard to use. You've obviously put a lot of thought into this - I like it. > The SPAM-filter simply picks the folder to copy/move the spam to, which app > to use, whether to play a sound when new spam arrives, whether to mark it > as read etc. This tab might also include the anti-virus settings. Perhaps the current anti-spam/virus wizards could be merged into this. > The current filter-dialogue would still be available, yet just as advanced > GUI. The drawback of this new approach is that it cannot handle complex > filter-rules that include several criteria, e.g. if email from xyz or zzz > but not from bbb yet with ddd as CC and bigger than 5kb but not older than > 5 days copy to folder abc. IMHO all dialogs should have a basic interface(but not too basic of course), as these are usually the most used actions, with an option for advanced configurations. -- David Roberts http://kavenc.sf.net/ _______________________________________________ kde-usability mailing list kde-usability@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability