[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: User Profiles
From:       Dirk_Schönberger <dirk.schoenberger () sz-online ! de>
Date:       2005-05-14 8:15:04
Message-ID: 000701c5585e$e0e807c0$2801a8c0 () rincewind
[Download RAW message or body]

> First, it seems like a ton of work to me to implement a basic and an
> advanced mode. A slider is overkill. Can anyone give an example of
> something specific in KDE with so many options that this makes sense?
> I'm willing to bet for any example this mailing list can come up with an
> intuitive solution that doesn't use a slider. Lets have some concrete
> situations instead of just theory :)

Why artificially disciminate between exactly two modes.
Make the whole GUI dynamic, i.e. changeable at runtime, and provide
"pre-factored" selections of settings.
If the user is not satified with a such a selection, it can be adapted to
their needs.

Seems to work at an application level (dynamic toolbars / menus, konqueror
view profiles), why not at "form level"?

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64191

Regards
Dirk



_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]