[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-usability
Subject: Re: System Preferences
From: Benjamin Meyer <ben+kdeusability () meyerhome ! net>
Date: 2005-02-04 2:59:11
Message-ID: 200502040301.23134.ben+kdeusability () meyerhome ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
> > You are talking about konqurors settings. Why would knoqurors settings
> > belong in kcontrol? They are application settings and have no place in
> > kde.
>
> There settings in Web behaviour that influence KDE as a whole.
>
> For example, Web Shortcuts affect KRun everywhere, not just in Konqueror.
> The history sidebar settings also affect the Universal Sidebar. The Plugins
> section affects anything that uses KParts.
looking at them again... nope they all seem very konqurish to me. Plugins
looks like netscape/mozille plugins... and the sidebar is in... yup konq
again. The only thing I pulled out was the proxy sense that is used by
kopete, kmail and just about every network applications (it really shouldn't
be in Konq).
> > Well this is just named badly. It isn't KDE performance, it is konquror
> > performance.
>
> There is a "System" tab in here too.
The kbuildsysco option? They thing that if you turn off will pretty much bork
you desktop. How many here even know what it is? I really don't think that
should be a gui at all. It is like an option to not turn on X11. If you
disable it you wont realize it to a lot later when you have problems and have
no clue how to fix it. Yah it is a cool thing to know for a system
administrator who want to deploy KDE on a read-only remote desktop, but not a
option for users in a gui next to "Change background image".
> > How about this? (ignoring the little errors) Each of the four tabs on top
> > have around seven items. Took me about two minutes to make the change.
> > (yah good code base to work from)
> >
> > http://www.icefox.net/gallery/pictures/2005/System%20Preferences/system_p
> >re ferences_tabs2.png
>
> I think this is somehwhat ugly - a drill in would be much nicer.
Sorry that was the best I could do from your description. I look forward to
finding out what a drill is.
> > The real downside to it is that it suddenly is very hard to search. You
> > have to manually go through each tab to see what is "active".
>
> That is assuming you have absolutely no idea what you are doing. If a user,
> even a new user who has only been using a computer for 1 day, does not know
> which of those root categories the setting should be under, they should
> *probably* not be messing with it anyways.
Ok, how about something *really* simply. You want to change the time format.
Rather then 12 hour days you want 24. If you go to System/Date & Time you
don't find it there and so you search for time which shows
internationalization. This is a perfect example of something that everyday
users would want to do and *would* do and even for a newbie they should be
able to do it. If you only ever display 7 items to the user there is little
point in having a search.
> Also - that "Search" isn't really a search - it is a filter. When I type a
> word in there, and it shades a module, I have no idea *why* that module is
> being shaded, so the shading is of little use, other than eye candy.
Good point, any better ideas of what to call it?
> For example, say I am trying to change my desktop background color. I type
> "colors".
>
> This filter would shade all icons ecept "Background" and "Colors" - now,
> where do I go to change this?
Well for that example appearance and desktop both show up.
> The same thing happends with all kinds of keywords, and it is the same
> broken "search" in the current KControl. The search is only useful if you
> know what the modules underneath the icons do in general - and if you
> already know that, why are you searching???
>
> The search needs to provide a *context* along with the filtered choices -
> It needs to describe the matched keywords as they relate to the KCM. In my
> above example, "colors", it could say by each icon
> "Allows you to change the background color"
> "Allows you to change system wide colors"
>
> There - now I know *exactly* what KCM I need.
Kinda like in OS-X's spotlight. :) It has a dropdown along with the
highlighting and from the dropdown you can select something.
> I know the API does not provide this right now, but if we are looking
> toward the future, this is really what is required.
Flesh out a few ideas, I agree the keyword system is a little lacking.
-Benjamin Meyer
--
aka icefox
Public Key: http://www.icefox.net/public_key.asc
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic