[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: de-crappifying konq (was: view-profiles)
From:       Mikolaj Machowski <mikmach () wp ! pl>
Date:       2004-10-29 16:07:43
Message-ID: 200410291807.43236.mikmach () wp ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]

Dnia czwartek, 28 października 2004 18:54, Aaron Seigo napisał:
> On October 28, 2004 1:56, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
> > Those are things only from top of my head.
>
> Tools plugins be able to specify "web" or "file" (or..?)
> Sidebar plugins be able to specify "web" or "file" (or..?)
> Context menu plugins be able to specify "web" or "file" (or..?)
> Profile-specific config dialogs.
>
> and most importantly: get rid of the profiles configuration. as an
> example, let's take the Home URL. we all know that the Home URL should
> be profile specific. but does this mean it should be in the PROFILES
> config? no. people will not look for it there. they will go "Configure
> <appname>" and expect it to be *there*.

Agree and don't agree. There should be special tool for "design" of
profiles. But profile configuration should be done only there. Current
profile behaviour can stay but only rather as a special bookmarks
mechanism (personally I prefer it than opening dir of bookmarks).

m.

-- 
LaTeX + Vim = http://vim-latex.sourceforge.net/
Vim Universal Templates 
	http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1078
CLEWN - http://clewn.sf.net


_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic