[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: usability review for KHangMan
From:       Aaron Seigo <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-08-21 14:18:20
Message-ID: 200408211618.20516.aseigo () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 20 August 2004 23:21, Matt Rogers wrote:
> In this case, I think rather than having somebody from the usability team
> implement them, the recommendations should be passed on to the KHangman
> maintainer and they should be allowed to handle the report as they see fit.
> There's already enough "bad blood" between the "normal developers" and the
> "usability team" that if these recommendations were to be implemented w/o
> the maintainer's approval. The shit will hit the fan.

agreed; and this will be one of the topics when the usability track starts 
monday.

Celeste: if you don't mind, i'd like to use your report as an example of the 
sort of work going on right now on kde-usability during the usability track 
here at aKademy as we need as many concrete examples as possible. i find it 
helpful to work with real examples/situations when trying to hammer out 
processes.

i look forward to seeing more such reports in the future... that's what, 2 in 
the last couple weeks? yea-ah!

-- 
Aaron Seigo, currently in Ludwigsburg
KDE World Conference 2004: aKademy
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]