[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: kcontrol module kcm_arts oversized
From:       Luciano Montanaro <mikelima () cirulla ! net>
Date:       2004-07-31 14:42:56
Message-ID: 200407311642.56922.mikelima () cirulla ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 31 July 2004 13:22, Florian Graessle wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:20:29 +0200
>
> Luciano Montanaro <mikelima@cirulla.net> wrote:
> > Ok. In the attachments there is a the new version of the changes.
> > I had to move around the options quite a bit, but I think the new
> > version is ok. I had to change the other panel too (It forced a
> > minimum height for no reason I could understand). With these changes,
> > the panel fits in an 800x600 screen when using a reasonably sized
> > font.
> >
> > If there is no objection, I'll commit the changes tomorrow evening.
> > (or sooner, if someone gives me a go-ahead).
>
> Maybe it's better to arrange the checkboxes on the left and their
> corresponding edit lines on the right of each line?
>
> See my a mock-up: http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~soma/bldr/hardwaretab.png
>
> I also changed the naming a little bit, got rid of "use" and "select".
> Shouldn't it be "sample rate" instead of "sampling rate"? I'm not a
> native speaker, but at least http://www.googlefight.com says so...
>
> What do you think?

Your version seems cleaner than mine, but since we are in message and feature 
freeze, I'd go for the minimal changes, for now.
And I'm not sure arts is going to be with us for much longer...

Luciano

-- 
Luciano Montanaro //
                \X/ mikelima@virgilio.it
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]