On Monday 26 July 2004 04:13, Jamethiel Knorth wrote: > >From: Frans Englich > I am aware that several exist, but cannot regularly find such things. Would > you be able to post a series of links to all such documents so that we can > make an attempt to sort out and merge together their ideas for one master > document to bind them all? Read my first mail. > I don't think there is any rush to have the discussion, but since so many > people are eager to change KControl, it would perhaps be good to help > everyone coordinate. If people are going to be working on designing and > programming KControl anyway, having some discussion would be good to avoid > them wasting their time. Yes, no one have denied that -- of course we should discuss it. The question is if we should wait or not. > > >* The KUA project is very vulnerable for "inappropriate" publicity, and I > >will > >hence ask Derek to go radio silent about it on the cvs-digest. It could > >also > >be of use to roughly sort out everything concerning kcontrol before Derek > >start mentioning it -- it could otherwise too lead to much unnecessary > >noise. > >Should I also ask Derek to be quiet on kcontrol-related commits?(until we > >have sorted all mess out) In that case, no blogging neither, of course. > > I don't know that it's necessary to keep it all quiet about the work on > KControl, I know why: * It will be hard to keep silent about the KUA project otherwise * We don't want more communication overhead than we already have. Let's keep things quite and controlled * Why not be silent? We will get publicity anyway, just not now. Frans _______________________________________________ kde-usability mailing list kde-usability@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability