--===============0366868506== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UbUb1R74e/gmwj6/DZzW" --=-UbUb1R74e/gmwj6/DZzW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If there is ANY need for plug ins at all, it would NOT be in the search interface, but rather as feeders for a robust metadata/indexing system, and ONE, only ONE search interface which would contact the metadata/indexing system and present results in unified form. Be it a list, icons, a detailed list or panes for each result, all of them bode much better than tabs. See Kazaa and the like. Why can't we build a search tool like kazaa?=20 Or... perhaps we can. Which again brings us back to the need for a robust metadata/indexing system. Any other search improvement attempt is just a pipe dream with less-than-ideal results. El mar, 01-06-2004 a las 20:26, Jamethiel Knorth escribi=C3=B3: > >From: Dik Takken > >Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:23:31 +0200 (CEST) > > > >On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > >>>Maybe, instead of cramming the results all in one widget, we could use > >>>tabs to display the results of different searches: > >>> > >>>+-------+ > >>> > >>>| Files | Music | Movies | Amazon.com > >>>| +-----------------------------------+ > >>>| foo 3K ... | > >>>| bar 5K ... | > >>>| .... | > >>> > >>>That way it would be very easy to add the results of more search agent= s, > >>>since all you would need was another tab. Also, the search agents coul= d > >>>define a suitable layout to present their results (i.e. presenting the > >>>album cover for music, display local local theaters for movies etc.) > >> > >>I don't like tabs that much, but it seems fine and consistent with we=20 > >>already > >>have in kde. > > > >I don't like Tabs either. I want to quickly see how many hits a have for= =20 > >earch plugin. Just scrolling a page is much more convenient than clickin= g=20 > >on all tabs. > > > >The only argument agaist 'cramming' all results into one page seems the = be=20 > >that it will become an inconsistent mess. I don't see why it would > >become a mess, but if people choose to mess it up anyway, tabs won't hel= p.=20 > >The output of each plugin is still the same, the only difference is that= =20 > >you can only see the results of one of them. > > > >You see, if each plugin just takes care of it's own output-section to lo= ok=20 > >nice and clean, I see no problem in displaying multiple sections on a=20 > >single page. If anyone can think of better arguments, please tell us. >=20 > I'm going to repeat myself. >=20 > I think it's a really bad idea to try to forceably mix plugins. If some=20 > plugins have sources that need to be mixed, a plugin can be made to mix=20 > them. There is no reason that a plugin needs to only have one source it=20 > searches. Too many plugins have completely unmixable results for the mixi= ng=20 > to be done automatically. It just doesn't work, regardless of whether it = is=20 > in tabs or in a single view. >=20 > _________________________________________________________________ > FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now!=20 > http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > kde-usability mailing list > kde-usability@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability --=20 Manuel Amador Jefe de I+D +593 (9) 847-7372 Amauta http://www.amautacorp.com/ GNU Privacy Guard key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net --=-UbUb1R74e/gmwj6/DZzW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAv3ZnWyznNMEDPK0RApwcAJ9SLEGWNPkvG22DPlxRzc4fXwwR1wCaA6Cx SnVcCSDmkmXLchqXu63yBU4= =QpVV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UbUb1R74e/gmwj6/DZzW-- --===============0366868506== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ kde-usability mailing list kde-usability@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability --===============0366868506==--