[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-usability
Subject: Re: simpler UI for konqy
From: Leo Savernik <l.savernik () aon ! at>
Date: 2004-01-16 13:40:47
Message-ID: 200401161440.56770.l.savernik () aon ! at
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 16. Januar 2004 11:28 schrieb Allan Sandfeld Jensen:
[...]
> I dont think there is a need for a distinct web browser. Where is konqueror
> insufficient as a browser?
Yes, I fully agree. My answer only hypothetically referred to the proposition
of making konqueror "behave like a completely different program depending
[on] mode".
> On the contrary I sometimes miss a distinct file-manager, because konqueror
> is best suited for browsing(online and offline) and not managing, but to
> solve this you would only need to be able to change between
> click-to-execute and click-to-select on the fly, something I trying to work
> out a model for.
Ctrl+Click selects objects as much on the fly as can be. I can't imagine a
more "on-the-fly" way.
>
[...]
mfg
Leo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAB+nmj5jssenUYTsRAsLxAKCIuEYcqqDPzJ6KEQzqKsP0em6SJQCguUAD
+PTuzosxr4bXIzWOb66xsfY=
=jCVH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic