Frans Englich wrote:
> There _are_ cases where having both the KDE and GNOME version around is just 
> exsessive, there is no reason. If you choose gedit in front of kedit you 
> really do it because you like GNOME/GTK feel not because of the app, and then 
> you should be running GNOME(and probably is - problem naturally gone). 
> There's a bunch of these highly identical apps, ie. System Monitor vs 
> ksysguard.

This is the kind of discussion I'm afraid of. kedit vs gedit, Epiphany 
vs Konqueror, etc. There is a boundary between simply apps that both 
desktops have an equivalent of and featureful apps such as a word 
processor, but it is hard to define. It could lead to lengthly 
discussions per case.

I understand your points and think you're right about having a dialog 
regarding this is a good thing. However I think this should only concern 
(or atleast begin with) very small applications such as kfind, 
kjobviewer, etc.

   - William
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability