-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op zondag 21 december 2003 20:13, schreef Aaron J. Seigo:
> On Sunday 21 December 2003 08:09, Michael Pye wrote:
> > Sensible defaults are important, but I think we should recognise that
> > there is generally another step between a KDE release and an end user.
>
> if our defaults are better than they are now, then distros will have less
> to do. this means:
>
>  o KDE is cheaper for them, ergo more attractive
>  o KDE is more consistent across distributions, which is good for KDE's
> marketing.
>
> the fact that distros have to customize KDE is a Bad Thing(tm). i really
> don't want to see KDE end up as GNOME has with Blue Curve, XD2 and Sun JDS
> all heavily customizing the desktop into unrecognizability just because the
> default settings are so horrid.

It's a little bit like having forks.

- -- 
Mvg, Sander Devrieze.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/5hkRK+G8aHNHCSMRAqM/AKCDEGmD88GpGETjJPHdrZxasy6g4ACgmLJg
UOLkdT7lqA8g8HDHvsCBT50=
=Pe27
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability