[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: KDE Janitors (QA?) Proposal
From:       "Carlos Leonhard Woelz" <carloswoelz () imap-mail ! com>
Date:       2003-12-20 21:50:26
[Download RAW message or body]


On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:16:00 -0500, "Dawit A." <adawit@kde.org> said:
> On Saturday 20 December 2003 09:01, Russell Miller wrote:
> > I've no complaints with the idea, but I think "janitors" is probably a
> > term that some will shy away from.  Not that there is anything
> > dishonorable with blue collar work, quite the contrary, but it does lend
> > to an image that some talented people will shy away from.
> >
> > I think that perhaps "KDE Quality Support Team" might be a good name.
> 
> I doubt the name would be a problem at all. IMHO it perfectly matches
> what the 
> proposal is advocating. "KDE Quality Support..." can easily be confused
> with 
> KDE QA which the author already stated is not the intent of his proposal.
> At 
> least not at this point. Besides the name resembles the "linux kernel 
> janitorial" team which basically does similar functions but for the
> kernel...
> 

I like KDE Quality Support very much. It is indeed the core of the
proposal, to care for the quality of the apps. Maybe if we have a clear
explanation that this is _no_ QA, we can keep this name. And KDE
janitors, well, I find it not bad, as I know about the Kernel Janitors.
But I would really like better a sexier name like KDE Quality Support,
nomething people would be proud to put in their signatures. I think it
_is_ important. 
-- 
  Carlos Leonhard Woelz
  carloswoelz@imap-mail.com

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about a decent email service?
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]