On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:05:31 +0100, "Kurt Pfeifle" said: > > Another critical success factor might be the name ;-) People might not be > > lining up to become "Janitor" :-) > > > > "Ombudsman" ? > > "Spokesman" ? > > "Liaison Officer" ? > > "Evangelist" ? > > "Product Manager" ? > > "Director for QA" ? > > "" ? > > Cheers, > Kurt [ volunteering to do what Waldo and Carlos suggested for KDEPrint > ] > Welcome on board! I am also a volunteer, but I am in search for a project.;) People already offer to help me write some some of the necessary docs, and I will start writing some basic stuff too. The plan is to follow the implementation schedule, and to make clear that the idea is not get in the developers way. Obviously, guys as experienced as you are can start right now. I really like the KDE Quality Team name, and more specifically, the Quality Teams. The name describes well the function, is not depreciative and can be used IMHO if we make clear this is no real QA at this time. -- Carlos Leonhard Woelz carloswoelz@imap-mail.com -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Sent 0.000002 seconds ago _______________________________________________ kde-usability mailing list kde-usability@mail.kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability