[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-usability
Subject: [RFC] Reply behavior in KMail
From: Ingo =?iso-8859-15?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date: 2003-11-28 23:18:00
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]
Hi,
first of all, please keep kmail@kde.org CC'ed.
As you might have noticed the behavior of KMail when using Reply has
changed since KDE 3.1. The current KMail tries to address the reply to
the original sender of the message if Reply is used even for
mailing-lists which set the Reply-to header. Of course this only works
if KMail can figure out the mailing-list address and therefore can
ignore it in case it's present in the Reply-to header. Anyway, what I'd
like to know is whether this change is usability-wise a good change or
not.
The current behavior is:
Reply ('r') -> reply to the original sender
Reply to Mailing-list ('l') -> reply to the mailing-list
The old behavior was:
Reply ('r') -> reply to Reply-to address if present, else to From; in
case of Reply-to mangling mailing-list (seems to be the majority
nowadays) this resulted in a reply to the mailing-list
Reply to Mailing-list ('l') -> reply to the mailing-list
With the old behavior it was impossible to send a private reply without
using the mouse to right-click on the sender's address (which means
that's actually an accessibility problem). This is the main reason why
the new behavior was introduced.
Things which should be improved after KDE 3.2:
a) Rephrase "Reply" to "Reply to Sender"
b) Replace the two Reply buttons in the toolbar with a
KToolBarPopupAction which contains all three Reply actions (-> one
button less on the toolbar ;-) ) similar to the Forward button. The
standard behavior of this button could be Reply to Mailing-list for
mailing-list messages and Reply (to Sender) for normal messages.
The question now is whether it's necessary to revert the behavior to the
old behavior until the new behavior is improved like above. The only
valid reason for this is that probably many users always used Reply in
case they wanted to reply to a mailing-list and that this worked for
them up to now. A few people complained about this on kmail@kde.org and
kde-pim@kde.org and there were also already 1 or 2 bugs reports about
this. Of course, only those people complain that don't like the change.
Those who like the new much more logical behavior don't speak up.
Therefore I'd like to know what the usability team thinks about this.
Regards,
Ingo
[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic