> Stop
> ----
> I am unsure about the Stop-button. Are there cases, where it is sensible to 
> stop loading a file in file management view and yet have part of the file 
> displayed? Otherwise, one could just click on a different file/folder or 
> whatever and thus stop loading a file. The the stop button could be dropped,

Hum..  For people navigating FTP and NFS shares, the stop button might let them
recover control of Konqueror.  Maybe not, because at least in FTP konqueror is
still usable, but I suppose in hard-mounted NFS shares it should hang or something.

Is stop still useful as a bandwidth-conserving lever,. you know, for those using
konq FTP over dialup lines?  I have no idea, because I prefer not to - it is too
slow and it feels like opening a new connection whenever I enter a new folder,
instead of keeping the old one alive.

> 
> as well.
> 
> By just putting all different view modes into one button and dropping
> "Print", 
> we could reduce the button number from 16 to 12, a reduction of 25%. Killing
> 
> "Stop" would even give us a 31.25% reduction.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Greetings,
> Christoph
> 
> -- 
>  | Christoph Niemann <cnieman@suse.de>
>  | SuSE Usability Guild
>  |
>  | Contrary to popular opinion, the plural of 'anecdote' is not 'fact'.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kde-usability mailing list
> kde-usability@mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
> 


    suerte,

    Rudd-O

===========================================================
     UNIVERSIDAD TECNICA FEDERICO SANTA MARIA
                 CAMPUS GUAYAQUIL
        CENTRO DE SERVICIOS INFORMATICOS
Mail enviado a traves de IMP-USM: http://www.usm.edu.ec/imp
    Los invitamos a visitar  http://www.usm.edu.ec
===========================================================
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability