On Tuesday 19 August 2003 20:49, Dawit A. wrote:
> On Monday 18 August 2003 18:46, Rand2342 wrote:
> > --- Datschge <datschge@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Google's archive (I think you refer to the cached websites) is not
> > > broken. In case you were referring to Google's newgroups section it
> > > wouldn't be broken either since groups.google.com is their subdomain.
> >
> > And how do we know if a domain name is a subdomain?
> > It is easy with .com and .org sites, but how about .uk domains (.co.uk,
> > .gov.uk, ...)?
>
> Ehhh... Why do you think those are any more difficult than the .com or .org
> sites. The problem actually is domains that do not follow what you
> outlined. That is instead of being foo.com.uk, they are simply foo.uk!
                                               ^^^^^^^
That should have read foo.co.uk.


-- 
Regards,
Dawit A.
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability