On Friday, Aug 8, 2003, at 16:33 America/New_York, William Leese wrote:
> I'm wondering if most users really use preview. In what way does 
> 'Preview'
> differ from opening the file in an application? All it does is open 
> the file
> in a 'lite' application.

Every time I introduce somebody to KDE, I devote a great deal of time 
to explaining the difference between Open and Preview.  It's time for 
Preview to go.  Preview annoys most users more than anything.


> Preview is only wanted if it's inline, right? Ofcourse there are are 
> files you
> want to a) view and b) edit, but in the end it's all the same as 'Open 
> with
> ..'.
>
> Is it beneficial to have "Open", "Open With.." and "Preview In"? 
> versus the
> more simple "Open" and "Actions"?
>
> Something like:
>
> Open
> Actions -> View (Embedded Viewer)
>                     Edit (Kate)
>                     -----------------------------------
>                     Encrypt File
>                     Print..
>                     -----------------------------------
>                     Other..
>
> This way we get rid of both Preview and Open With.. which all have 
> similar
> functionality.

I think Actions (call it anything else, it doesn't really matter) is an 
unnecessary submenu.  Open, Open With.., and that's all we need.  I do 
like your idea of View and Edit, as well, only in place of the existing 
system completely -- but would that leave us with Edit With?  As for 
Encrypt File, I'm almost thinking that's wasted menu space.  Simplicity 
in menus is nice.

But the Actions submenu is just hiding the problem, moving it to 
somewhere else where it's even uglier, without directly addressing the 
problem at hand in the first place.

_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability