On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:44:27PM +0200, Daniele Medri wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > Alle 11:19, marted? 5 agosto 2003, Mikolaj Machowski ha scritto: > > 4. Image file in directory view > > > > Open in New Window " OK > > Open in Background Tab " These two can be reduced to one > > Open in New Tab > > Cut " OK > > Copy " > > Rename " OK > > Move To Trash " These two should be reduced to one > > Delete " > > Add to Bookmarks " OK > > Open With ... " [1] > > Gimp " [2] > > Preview in Embeddable Image Viewer " [3] > > Actions > " OK > > Edit file type " Go away! > > Properties " OK > > > > 1 - Why? It is already defined in next item. > > 2 - Shouldn't it be just "Open"? Now we can reduce these two items to > > one > > 3 - OK but name is tooooooooooo long. Preview is enough. > > > > Now we have: > > > > Open in New Window > > Open in New Tab > > Cut > > Copy > > Rename > > Delete > > Add to Bookmarks > > Open > > Preview in This Tab > > Actions > > > Properties > IMHO the "Open" and "Preview in This Tab" aren't correct. > I'd like to see only "Preview" item as "Open" functionality.. and into > "Proprieties" a user can set what defaults viewer for that kind of file type. > A common user couldn't know what the difference between "Open" and "Preview": > he need to view that kind of file and an intelligent system should select > appropriated apps fot that. If I open an image into Gimp is "preview" but > also "open to edit". > The "Preview in This Tab" could be into "Actions" submenu as particular option I saw redundancy after sending. I am in favor of separate actions (in main menu) "Open to edit" and "Open to see" - Preview. The latter would be basically opening in Konqueror: Edit <- for all types of files, executables could have Execute (or Open :/) Preview Preview in New Window Preview in New Tab Cut Copy Rename Delete Add to Bookmarks Actions > Properties I think there will be obvious difference between Edit and Preview: Preview in embedded viewer or "light" program without possibility of changing file. Edit is for making changes in file. This can apply also to non-image files. > > 5. Image in embedded viewer > > ack > > > > Up " OK > > Back > > Forward > > Open in New Window " It is already opened in Konq > > Open in Background Tab " > > Open in New Tab > > Add to Bookmarks " OK > > Open With ... " As above > > Gimp " > > Save Image As... " OK > > Send " OK? > > Select All " ??????? [0] > > Stop Animations " OK > > Copy Image Location " ??? [1] > > View Image (title.png) " ??? [2] > > View Document Source " Heh... [3] > > View Document Information " that would be good but... [4] > > Security " OK? > > Set Encoding " End everything is clear. > > > > Many items in this menu is coming from opening of web sites. It should > > be make different if opening from file:// or from http:// > > > > 0 - for what? Unnecessary > > 1 - Where copying? not understandable - unnecessary > > 2 - We are already viewing it > > 3 - Source for Image? > > 4 - This would be good but dialog offers no valuable information. Please > > improve dialog: size, any embedded information, add possibility to > > meta info. > > > > Now we have: > > > > Up " OK > > Back > > Forward > > Add to Bookmarks " OK > > Open > > Save Image As... " OK > > Send " OK? > > Stop Animations " OK > > View Document Information " that would be good but... [4] > > Security " OK? > why don't put a "Propriety" item that include "Set encoding" features and > "Security"? Why "Set encoding" for image???? Maybe it will be useful with SVG files but for most formats it is useless. I am also not sure if Security is necessary. Half ot this menu (in current state) is just copied from http context menu. m. _______________________________________________ kde-usability mailing list kde-usability@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability