From kde-usability Tue Aug 06 21:35:17 2002 From: Christoph Held Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 21:35:17 +0000 To: kde-usability Subject: Re: KDE Control Center X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-usability&m=102866922531453 On Tuesday 06 August 2002 17:52, Waldo Bastian wrote: > On Tuesday 06 August 2002 01:19 am, Christoph Held wrote: > > On Monday 05 August 2002 23:37, Waldo Bastian wrote: > > > On Monday 05 August 2002 02:14 pm, Christoph Held wrote: > > > > On Monday 05 August 2002 22:02, Waldo Bastian wrote: > > > > > On Monday 05 August 2002 12:36 pm, Christoph Held wrote: > > > > > > On Monday 05 August 2002 20:24, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > Which kcm modules will be hidden? > I don't want to go into details because it's not a current topic (I also = don't=20 have cvs access - so you don't have to be scared kcm moduls will just=20 disappear ;-) ). Let's look at (the not yet finished) kpersonalizer: There is a "feel"=20 manager/wizard, a speed manager/wizard and a "look" manager/wizard. One c= an=20 configure the desktop very easy and with very few mouse clicks.These mana= ger=20 are good for the majority but are not flexible enough for everyone. If o= ne=20 compares kcontrol look & feel with kpersonalizer, the section looks=20 cluttert, messy and difficult. I would suggest to put only 3-6 managers/=20 wizards in the look & feel section. These wizards are supposed to be task= =20 oriented and guess what the user wants. Then provide additonal methods to= =20 further customize the desktop e.g. advance settings buttons, customize ta= bs,=20 or simply move all the current kcm moduls in a look&feel->advanced settin= gs=20 subtree. Again, not a current topic.=20 Greetings Christoph _______________________________________________ kde-usability mailing list kde-usability@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability