From kde-telepathy  Fri Jul 20 12:26:23 2012
From: "Daniele E. Domenichelli" <daniele.domenichelli () gmail ! com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:26:23 +0000
To: kde-telepathy
Subject: Re: Introspect Blocks
Message-Id: <50094E6F.7070203 () gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-telepathy&m=134278745222272

On 20/07/12 13:43, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
>>> 1) Have in*ktp-common-internals*. This is the easier way to get it merged
>>> >>  somewhere, but you cannot use the QDBusConnectionPrivate class, you must
>>> >>  instead implement a registeObject method (and an unregister one too) similar
>>> >>  to QDBusConnection::registerObject instead, and you have to call it every
>>> >>  time you call that method
> I would go for this one for the moment. It's the easiest goal. And if
> the API is really good, we can consider moving it to telepathy-qt. It
> doesn't matter much if we need a different registerObject method.

I just had an idea: We could have a method that calls internally 
QDBusConnection::registerObject. It could be a method in the dbustube 
channel so we don't need to pass the QDBusConnection around...

What do you think?


Daniele
_______________________________________________
KDE-Telepathy mailing list
KDE-Telepathy@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy