This could be the symlink problem... The qt headers are symlinks, unfortunately with absolute paths :-( Please test what the links point to. You can "repair" this by doing: make symlink if you don't have a Makefile, you have to say configure ... first. Choose resonable options for this. It is not too important, because you won't compile anyway, but you need to get all headers in your makefiles. eva On Thursday 06 September 2001 12:11, Tom Debruyne wrote: > Hi Mathias, > This is the tail -n 34 of config.log > configure:5271: checking for Qt > configure:5432: rm -rf SunWS_cache; g++ -o conftest -O2 -fno-exceptions > -fno-check-new -W -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings > -Wno-long-long -Wnon-virtual-dtor -fno-builtin -INO > -I/usr/openwin/include -L/local/kde22/qt-2.3.0/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib > conftest.C -lqt -lpng -lz -lm -ljpeg -lXext -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lsocket > -lnsl -lresolv 1>&5 > conftest.C:2: qglobal.h: No such file or directory > conftest.C:3: qapplication.h: No such file or directory > conftest.C:4: qapp.h: No such file or directory > conftest.C:5: qobjcoll.h: No such file or directory > conftest.C:6: qevent.h: No such file or directory > conftest.C:7: qstring.h: No such file or directory > conftest.C:8: qstyle.h: No such file or directory > conftest.C:9: qiconview.h: No such file or directory > conftest.C:11: #error 1 > configure: failed program was: > #include "confdefs.h" > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #if ! (QT_VERSION >= 222) > #error 1 > #endif > > int main() { > QStringList *t = new QStringList(); > QIconView iv(0); > iv.setWordWrapIconText(false); > QString s; > s.setLatin1("Elvis is alive", 14); > int magnolia = QEvent::Speech; /* new in 2.2 beta2 */ > return 0; > } > > I said "most" but actually, I didn't succeeded in compiling any > application using QT since I have upgraded to qt2.3.0 > > tdebruyn@bru-cse-520% echo $QTDIR > /var/local/user/kde22/qt-2.3.0 > tdebruyn@bru-cse-520% echo $KDEDIR > /var/local/user/kde22 > > Using include and lib flag is probably redundant but I wanted to make > sure. > > Thanks, > Tom ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde-solaris mailing list. Account management: http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-solaris. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.