From kde-sdk-devel Tue May 29 23:43:31 2012 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_D=F6rner?= Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 23:43:31 +0000 To: kde-sdk-devel Subject: Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Migration of KDESDK to git Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-sdk-devel&m=133833519116248 Sorry, I missed that these are in refs/workbranch and thus not listed by git branch (didn't check that the repo is complete wrt that svn search below, though). On 30 May 2012 00:15, Sebastian D=F6rner w= rote: > I think Nicolas already pointed out the kinstance-redesign work > branch, which does not show up the standard conversion. And there seem > to be more of them: > > http://stuff.povaddict.com.ar/kde-svn-search.php?substring=3Dkcachegrind&= hidetrinity=3Dyes&hidei18n=3Dyes > > These branches seem to affect larger parts of kdesdk though, so maybe > we should add something to the common rules. > > On 29 May 2012 21:37, Josef Weidendorfer wrot= e: >> Hi, >> >> Am 29.05.2012 01:10, schrieb Sebastian D=F6rner: >> >>> I've had a look at the rules and they do not go into many specifics of >>> kdesdk, they are mostly stubs. They do take into account the move from >>> /trunk to /trunk/KDE, but that is basically all. >> >> >> It looks like the stub rules are fine for kcachegrind, as >> - kcachegrind always was in kdesdk, any moves were done only in >> its subdirectory, >> - there were no SVN branches apart from the KDE releases. >> At least, the git repo I get from a test conversion on dewey.kde.org >> looks fine... >> >> I updated the wiki accordingly. >> >> Thanks, >> Josef >> _______________________________________________ >> kde-sdk-devel mailing list >> kde-sdk-devel@kde.org >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel _______________________________________________ kde-sdk-devel mailing list kde-sdk-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel