[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-sdk-devel
Subject:    Re: KDESDK to git migration: how many repos for the small developer utils?
From:       Michael Pyne <mpyne () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-05-22 23:20:34
Message-ID: 1828177.MaDOiSsX2p () midna
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 18:31:12 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> How should these submodules be split?
> a) One repo with all?
> b) "scripts" in a separate repo, rest in one?
> c) Each an own repo?
> d) ?

I would vote for b) as well. It keeps all the scripts together without 
implying that there is a build step required (even the shell CMakeLists.txt 
just installs the scripts directly).

However Albert had mentioned that changing the module name would be annoying 
from a translation perspective, we'd want to double-check what is necessary to 
merge the different submodules into one/two git modules at the end.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
kde-sdk-devel mailing list
kde-sdk-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]