[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-sdk-devel
Subject: Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Layout of "lokalize" and "kompare" git repos with plugins integrated (was: Re
From: Sebastian_Dörner <sebastian () sebastian-doerner ! de>
Date: 2012-12-20 0:01:59
Message-ID: CA+_kBjBPU9s_atVNDL=kF7NwKy2ndhhu5J5ay8Si2XfSoHTEbA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On 19 December 2012 18:22, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> wrote:
> El Dimarts, 18 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:07:03, Jeremy Whiting va
> escriure:
> > Albert,
> >
> > I got all of kdesdk subfolders to build standalone using the attached
> > (huge) patch. I want to get someone besides myself to take a look
> before I
> > commit it though, but here it makes it so kdesdk can be built as one
> > module, and also each subfolder (except docs) can be built by itself.
>
> One of the thing we did for kdegames is move the docs inside the modules
> they
> belong to in svn (before moving to git) this way we could check that
> installing the svn repo and installing all the git modules (without any
> change) gave exactly the same result.
>
Sorry if this comes a bit late, but this is probably a bad idea. The
current rules expect the docs where they are and the conversion puts
docs/$APP into $APP/docs. Getting this right was quite a hassle (e.g. as
some docs originally came from the common docs/scripts directory), and I
wouldn't want to touch that again.
> I can help with that if you want (it needs more than just the move, needs a
> small tweak with the CMakeLists.txt)
>
> Cheers,
> Albert
>
>
> > I
> > removed quite a bit from the top level CMakeLists.txt so it's just a
> bunch
> > of add_subdirectory calls. I also took out pimlibs detection and
> couldn't
> > find any subdir that needed/used it. That was either in there from
> > something that has since been removed or is an optional dependency for
> > something. If anyone knows which we may need to tweak this before
> > committing.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Jeremy
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>
> wrote:
> > > El Dimarts, 11 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:03:07, Jeremy Whiting va
> > >
> > > escriure:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to some awesome students in Brazil we have most (maybe all) of
> > > > the
> > > > kdesdk migration rules written. I have done an initial conversion
> with
> > >
> > > the
> > >
> > > > existing rules last night and pushed to scratch repos on
> > > > http://quickgit.kde.org/scratch/whiting/(cervisia, dolphin-plugins,
> > > > kapptemplate, kcachegrind, kde-dev-scripts, kde-dev-utils, kompare,
> > > > lokalize, okteta, poxml, strigi-analyzers, and umbrello).git If
> each of
> > > > you that is a maintainer of one of the above projects could please
> clone
> > > > the repositories, make sure no tags or branches that you expect are
> > >
> > > missing
> > >
> > > > (and no extra branches that don't belong to your project are in
> there)
> > >
> > > then
> > >
> > > > mark the "Maintainer approved" column on
> > > > http://community.kde.org/KDESDK/Git_Migration#Migration_Rules I
> would
> > > > really appreciate it.
> > > >
> > > > The umbrello developers and I are hoping we can do the actual
> conversion
> > > > this weekend before the 4.10 RC 1 tag, but in order for that to
> happen
> > > > we
> > > > need these all to be verified and I need to make it so we can release
> > > > the
> > > > 4.10 tarball from git repos (I've done that before for kde-edu and
> > > > kde-accessibility, but can't recall how that's done, so will figure
> that
> > > > out in the next few days).
> > >
> > > The projects don't build standalone (at least poxml doesn't).
> > >
> > > I suggest we/you do the same we did with kdegames, that is, make them
> > > build
> > > standalone in svn before the split, so the splitted repo can be
> verified
> > > to
> > > build correctly without any "manual" modification.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Albert
> > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Jeremy Whiting
> > > >
> > > > P.S. It would have been much nicer if there were a kdesdk mailing
> list,
> > >
> > > but
> > >
> > > > I guess since the module is a group of such separate utilities one
> has
> > > > never been created, should we create one?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Nick Shaforostoff <shafff@ukr.net>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Currently:
> > > > > > > repo name / display name: lokalize / Lokalize
> > > > > > > description: Computer-aided i18n translation
> > > > >
> > > > > just 'Computer-aided translation'
> > > > >
> > > > > > > project manager (user id on projects.kde.org needed): ?, ?,
> ...
> > > > >
> > > > > my id is 'shaforo'
> > > > >
> > > > > > Data needed!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > layout in kdesdk:
> > > > > > > /
> > > > > > > +- lokalize
> > > > > > > +- strigi-analyzer
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +- po
> > > > > > > +- ts
> > > > > > > +- xliff
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +- thumbnailers
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +- po
> > > > >
> > > > > i don't really care, but personally i'm for this layout, because
> > >
> > > lokalize
> > >
> > > > > depends on analyzers, but not vice-versa.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> > > > > Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
> > > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 19 \
December 2012 18:22, Albert Astals Cid <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:aacid@kde.org" target="_blank">aacid@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br> \
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">El Dimarts, 18 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:07:03, Jeremy \
Whiting va<br> escriure:<br>
<div class="im">> Albert,<br>
><br>
> I got all of kdesdk subfolders to build standalone using the attached<br>
> (huge) patch. I want to get someone besides myself to take a look before I<br>
> commit it though, but here it makes it so kdesdk can be built as one<br>
> module, and also each subfolder (except docs) can be built by itself.<br>
<br>
</div>One of the thing we did for kdegames is move the docs inside the modules \
they<br> belong to in svn (before moving to git) this way we could check that<br>
installing the svn repo and installing all the git modules (without any<br>
change) gave exactly the same result.<br></blockquote><div style>Sorry if this comes \
a bit late, but this is probably a bad idea. The current rules expect the docs where \
they are and the conversion puts docs/$APP into $APP/docs. Getting this right was \
quite a hassle (e.g. as some docs originally came from the common docs/scripts \
directory), and I wouldn't want to touch that again.</div> <div \
style><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br>
I can help with that if you want (it needs more than just the move, needs a<br>
small tweak with the CMakeLists.txt)<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Albert<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
> I<br>
> removed quite a bit from the top level CMakeLists.txt so it's just a \
bunch<br> > of add_subdirectory calls. I also took out pimlibs detection and \
couldn't<br> > find any subdir that needed/used it. That was either in there \
from<br> > something that has since been removed or is an optional dependency \
for<br> > something. If anyone knows which we may need to tweak this before<br>
> committing.<br>
><br>
> thanks,<br>
> Jeremy<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Albert Astals Cid <<a \
href="mailto:aacid@kde.org">aacid@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br> > > El Dimarts, 11 \
de desembre de 2012, a les 18:03:07, Jeremy Whiting va<br> > ><br>
> > escriure:<br>
> > > Hello all,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Thanks to some awesome students in Brazil we have most (maybe all) \
of<br> > > > the<br>
> > > kdesdk migration rules written. I have done an initial conversion \
with<br> > ><br>
> > the<br>
> ><br>
> > > existing rules last night and pushed to scratch repos on<br>
> > > <a href="http://quickgit.kde.org/scratch/whiting/(cervisia" \
target="_blank">http://quickgit.kde.org/scratch/whiting/(cervisia</a>, \
dolphin-plugins,<br> > > > kapptemplate, kcachegrind, kde-dev-scripts, \
kde-dev-utils, kompare,<br> > > > lokalize, okteta, poxml, strigi-analyzers, \
and umbrello).git If each of<br> > > > you that is a maintainer of one of \
the above projects could please clone<br> > > > the repositories, make sure \
no tags or branches that you expect are<br> > ><br>
> > missing<br>
> ><br>
> > > (and no extra branches that don't belong to your project are in \
there)<br> > ><br>
> > then<br>
> ><br>
> > > mark the "Maintainer approved" column on<br>
> > > <a href="http://community.kde.org/KDESDK/Git_Migration#Migration_Rules" \
target="_blank">http://community.kde.org/KDESDK/Git_Migration#Migration_Rules</a> I \
would<br> > > > really appreciate it.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > The umbrello developers and I are hoping we can do the actual \
conversion<br> > > > this weekend before the 4.10 RC 1 tag, but in order for \
that to happen<br> > > > we<br>
> > > need these all to be verified and I need to make it so we can \
release<br> > > > the<br>
> > > 4.10 tarball from git repos (I've done that before for kde-edu \
and<br> > > > kde-accessibility, but can't recall how that's done, \
so will figure that<br> > > > out in the next few days).<br>
> ><br>
> > The projects don't build standalone (at least poxml doesn't).<br>
> ><br>
> > I suggest we/you do the same we did with kdegames, that is, make them<br>
> > build<br>
> > standalone in svn before the split, so the splitted repo can be \
verified<br> > > to<br>
> > build correctly without any "manual" modification.<br>
> ><br>
> > Cheers,<br>
> ><br>
> > Albert<br>
> ><br>
> > > thanks,<br>
> > > Jeremy Whiting<br>
> > ><br>
> > > P.S. It would have been much nicer if there were a kdesdk mailing \
list,<br> > ><br>
> > but<br>
> ><br>
> > > I guess since the module is a group of such separate utilities one \
has<br> > > > never been created, should we create one?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Nick Shaforostoff <<a \
href="mailto:shafff@ukr.net">shafff@ukr.net</a>><br> > ><br>
> > wrote:<br>
> > > > > > Currently:<br>
> > > > > > repo name / display name: lokalize / Lokalize<br>
> > > > > > description: Computer-aided i18n translation<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > just 'Computer-aided translation'<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > > > project manager (user id on <a \
href="http://projects.kde.org" target="_blank">projects.kde.org</a> needed): ?, ?, \
...<br> > > > ><br>
> > > > my id is 'shaforo'<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > > Data needed!<br>
> > > > ><br>
> > > > > > layout in kdesdk:<br>
> > > > > > /<br>
> > > > > > +- lokalize<br>
> > > > > > +- strigi-analyzer<br>
> > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > +- po<br>
> > > > > > +- ts<br>
> > > > > > +- xliff<br>
> > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > +- thumbnailers<br>
> > > > > ><br>
> > > > > > +- po<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > i don't really care, but personally i'm for this layout, \
because<br> > ><br>
> > lokalize<br>
> ><br>
> > > > depends on analyzers, but not vice-versa.<br>
> > > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > > Kde-scm-interest mailing list<br>
> > > > <a \
href="mailto:Kde-scm-interest@kde.org">Kde-scm-interest@kde.org</a><br> > > \
> > <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest</a><br> \
_______________________________________________<br> Kde-scm-interest mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Kde-scm-interest@kde.org">Kde-scm-interest@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
_______________________________________________
kde-sdk-devel mailing list
kde-sdk-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic