[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-scm-interest
Subject: [Kde-scm-interest] Re: Tracking directory moves
From: Ian Monroe <ian.monroe () gmail ! com>
Date: 2010-11-22 18:35:27
Message-ID: 1290450927.1489.6.camel () tekka2
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
----- Original message -----
> On Monday 22 November 2010 18.47.10 Arno Rehn wrote:
> > On Monday 22 November 2010 18:29:20 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> [...]
> > > Also as Niko said if you are planning on splitting the kdebindings
> > > module
> > > into it's different languages the git migration would the time to do
> > > it.
> >
> > Yep, we're planning on this. However we've agreed that it would be
> > easier to do convert the module as a monolithic repo first and then
> > split it with git. I don't know if that's still feasible though after
> > the recent problems.
>
> Just out of curiosity, why did you descide it would be easier to do this
> in git then during the migration?
Well just that svn2git rules take several hours to "compile". So with any change to \
the rules, it takes a long time to test. That was really all our thinking.
But if splitting up in svn2git rules is easier (in human time, if not cpu time) then \
perhaps that's what we should.
Ian
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> <html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="generator" content="Osso Notes">
<title></title></head>
<body>
<p>----- Original message -----
<br>> On Monday 22 November 2010 18.47.10 Arno Rehn wrote:
<br>> > On Monday 22 November 2010 18:29:20 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
<br>> [...]
<br>> > > Also as Niko said if you are planning on splitting the kdebindings
<br>> > > module
<br>> > > into it's different languages the git migration would the time to \
do <br>> > > it.
<br>> >
<br>> > Yep, we're planning on this. However we've agreed that it would be
<br>> > easier to do convert the module as a monolithic repo first and then
<br>> > split it with git. I don't know if that's still feasible though after
<br>> > the recent problems.
<br>>
<br>> Just out of curiosity, why did you descide it would be easier to do this
<br>> in  git then during the migration?
<br>
<br>Well just that svn2git rules take several hours to "compile". So with any change \
to the rules, it takes a long time to test. That was really all our thinking. <br>
<br>But if splitting up in svn2git rules is easier (in human time, if not cpu time) \
then perhaps that's what we should. <br>
<br>Ian</p>
</body>
</html>
_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic