[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-scm-interest
Subject:    Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs
From:       George Goldberg <grundleborg () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2010-09-09 14:43:36
Message-ID: AANLkTi=gmmCb+T+adPO3NwaRDVg5uDNmMvHtE2UXJJp= () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 9 September 2010 14:33, Ian Monroe <ian@monroe.nu> wrote:
> I'm not really sure if I agree with 'module sovereignty' here. :)
>
> But I overall agree with your point of course. We could create a list
> of which repos are to be split (and how they are to be split), and
> then take this to k-c-d. Basically repos which are a collection of
> apps, which might share some well defined libraries but not much else
> (kdemultimedia, kdegames) they should be split. kdelibs shouldn't be
> split. Probably should consult with folks for gray-area cases like
> koffice and kdebase.

Sorry for being a bit pedantic, but just in case there's any room for
misunderstanding...

kdenetwork (I don't know about other modules, but there may be others)
doesn't have any libraries at all within it (unlike the libkdegames
library used in multiple places throughout kdegames). It is simply 5
totally unconnected applications put together in a module.

--
George
_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]