[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-scm-interest
Subject:    Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs
From:       Michael Jansen <info () michael-jansen ! biz>
Date:       2010-09-08 16:14:31
Message-ID: 201009081814.31763.info () michael-jansen ! biz
[Download RAW message or body]


> I heard that before, and although I do agree with the general 'who does
> the work decides', I don't think it applies 100% here. k-c-d was not
> informed or I don't recall a call on blogs like 'hey we decided to go for
> git, please come now to discuss the git details', i don't recall blogs
> explaining the setup either. Things that influence how we as KDE work need
> to be communicated well and people can not always be simply told to shut up
> because they don't do the work. If things influence big parts of KDE there
> needs to be a widespread support for the idea.

I brought up that point before. 

http://www.mail-archive.com/kde-scm-interest@kde.org/msg01000.html

It was not really successful.

To bring everyone on the same page here some links to old threads that started 
like this one:

http://www.mail-archive.com/kde-scm-interest@kde.org/msg00935.html

http://www.mail-archive.com/kde-scm-interest@kde.org/msg00863.html

Both are really big, bring up every point one could make And made no 
difference.

Mike

_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]