[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-scm-interest
Subject:    Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs
From:       Sune Vuorela <nospam () vuorela ! dk>
Date:       2010-09-08 8:02:43
Message-ID: slrni8egp3.rvp.nospam () sshway ! ssh ! pusling ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2010-09-07, Dominik Haumann <dhaumann@kde.org> wrote:
> Christoph doesn't suggest to split kdelibs. All he suggests is to move 
> kdelibs/kate and kdelibs/interfaces/ktexteditor to the own Kate module. We 
> are practicing this for more than half a year now anyway, and have 
> tremendous success with that. It's so easy to build Kate with just some 
> commands - we really really would like to keep it that way [1].
>
> And the good news is that nothing in kdelibs depends on Kate or the 
> KTextEditor interfaces. So technically this is no issue.
>
> Besides, Kate would continue to be released with KDE just like now, so it 
> should be perfectly safe even if we have our own module :)

I think moving stuff in or out of kdelibs is not something to be decided
in this maillist, but a topic for k-c-d.

And note that you cannot move things out of kdelibs (except to maybe
move them to kdesupport), but *never* the other way. Else we don't keep
binary compatibility of kdelibs as a whole.

/Sune

_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]