[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-scm-interest
Subject:    Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs
From:       Torgny Nyblom <kde () nyblom ! org>
Date:       2010-09-08 10:59:35
Message-ID: 20100908125935.4501750a () explosive ! nyblom ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:03:39 -0500
Ian Monroe <ian@monroe.nu> wrote:

[...]
> AFAIK, its impossible to have svn2git rules for a monolithic repo like
> KDE Multimedia with submodules like Dragon Player produce complete
> history. So I think we are misunderstanding each other?

Why? What kind of change cannot svn2git handle?

> It's likely possible to create a complete history (meaning, a separate
> git commit for every SVN commit) for Dragon Player once its treated as
> a separate repo by svn2git. And therefore Torgny Nyblom's concerns
> about splitting making history-completeness worse are misplaced.

Why would this be easier? Use these rules in the above context but with
a prefix if necessary.

/Regards
Torgny
_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]