[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-scm-interest
Subject:    Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?
From:       Riccardo Iaconelli <riccardo () kde ! org>
Date:       2010-02-12 18:30:56
Message-ID: 201002121930.56599.riccardo () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 12 February 2010 18:52:43 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> - one should not have to resort to a different repository to actually
>   checkout an older version. you can't do that with a subtree merge.

is it really such a frequently used feature? i think this is really a minor 
thing.

> - the actual data should not be duplicated. the repositories will be
>   large enough as is. that's the antithesis of a subtree merge.

how big would the real impact be? i agree this is a problem if it gets too 
big, I'm just trying to get realistic ideas based on realistic data. Of course 
I think we should be wiser in the future once we know about this limitation 
and not put the whole oxygen icons in kdelibs. :-)

> i can remember more:
> - git speed

Sure, it will be slower. However, I used it for years on modules as big as 
kdelibs or kdebase, and never had a problem, it just hangs a bit the first 
time (~20 secs), but it's still very bearable. Do you think it's a real 
problem?

> - merge conflicts
> - side effects of fixing history

What do you mean?

Bye,
-Riccardo
-- 
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平
Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu Mир Wolakota Santiphap Irini Peoch שלום
Shanti Vrede Baris Rój Mír Taika Rongo Sulh Mir Py'guapy 평화
_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]