On Friday 12. February 2010 00.09.36 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > The concensus among KOffice developers, for now, is that we stay with
> > a non-splited KOffice for the time being.
> 
> well, that's my point. i think it's unwise to decide before kde as a
> whole has done so, as most of the criteria (and the tooling what will
> hopefully result from that) are applicable to koffice as well.

Unwise, maybe. Its just that waiting longer will cause more grief. The pain of 
*not* being on git is felt every day and postponing in hope that somebody will 
write a better way to handle many repos is just not a gamble that makes sense 
to me.
It looks like work on writing the rulesets has all but stopped[1], not sure if 
thats due to the reopening of this splitting issue. It would not surprise me. 
Bottom line is that these delays alone are in my personal opinion not worth 
the fringe benefits splitting may bring. C'est La Vie.
So I and many others in KOffice think that its time to move KOffice to git.

1) http://gitorious.org/svn2git
-- 
Thomas Zander
_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest