On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:47:24PM +0100, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> > (though i'm sure you'll just abuse this to circumvent the general
> > decision on splitting up),
>
> KDE having splited packages have no effect on KOffice having splited
> packages.  It is perfectly possible for KDE to a splited scheme while
> KOffice remains monolithic.
>
yes, of course. i mean, some uniformity regarding the handling of kde
repos is probably advisable, but it probably doesn't have much impact.

> The concensus among KOffice developers, for now, is that we stay with
> a non-splited KOffice for the time being.
> 
well, that's my point. i think it's unwise to decide before kde as a
whole has done so, as most of the criteria (and the tooling what will
hopefully result from that) are applicable to koffice as well.

> Decision that will be reevaluated later if needed, possible and
> desirable.
>
as noted before, this would buy you *a lot* of trouble. consequently,
the reevaluation would have an amazing inertia against it. which pretty
much would make it "impossible" or "undesirable".
_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest