This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--===============1397668252==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig6C9B63017A84B7164156061E"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig6C9B63017A84B7164156061E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2/11/2010 10:30 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> while the actual decision is up to you (though i'm sure you'll just
> abuse this to circumvent the general decision on splitting up),

As far as I was aware, the decisions being made revolve around KDE.
KOffice is a separate entity. In other words: your snark is unnecessary.

> reason given is totally bogus - current svn's branch tracking is
> excellent, and even supports cases git does not (and possibly never
> will) support.

Which doesn't mean that people can't be far more comfortable with the
Git branching workflow.


--------------enig6C9B63017A84B7164156061E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkt0ccMACgkQANYdqNCuGCWBCwCg2chVjRqMGsPdZiXCYC6AoTtI
M94AoOcLDd/2v3g8miDtYucC/LuxXmwd
=FhXX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig6C9B63017A84B7164156061E--

--===============1397668252==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest

--===============1397668252==--