From kde-release-team Sun Apr 14 21:48:37 2024 From: Albert Astals Cid Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:48:37 +0000 To: kde-release-team Subject: Re: KDE Gear: add Kalm Message-Id: <57105614.LnF1eQmvNf () xps15> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-release-team&m=171313116311348 El dimecres, 27 de mar=C3=A7 del 2024, a les 9:23:54 (CEST), Plata va escri= ure: > Thanks for the feedback! >=20 >=20 > Generally, I think the reasoning makes sense. However, in the case of > Kalm, I don't think it's required. If you look at the app, it's pretty > simplistic (intentionally, due to its purpose). >=20 > Therefore, I would prefer to just get it out to the public to eventually > get some feedback. I think it's pretty unlikely that anybody will notice > it if I just create a release myself. The dependency freeze for KDE Gear 24.05 is this thursday, it would be good= if=20 we get some tie breaking comment here so far we have two votes (the person= =20 proposing it for yes "obvious, so only gets 0.5 value for yes") and (me vot= ing=20 0.5 against). Cheers, Albert >=20 > > El dilluns, 25 de mar=C3=A7 de 2024, a les 8:10:43 (CET), Plata va escr= iure: > >> Dear Release Team, > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> Kalm has spent some time in KDE Review (see > >> https://invent.kde.org/utilities/kalm/-/issues/2). Can we add it > >> to/release it in KDE Gear? > >=20 > > As far as I understand Kalm has never been released, right? > >=20 > > For new apps *personally* I always suggest to do a few releases on your > > own > > because it allows for much faster feature turn-around than KDE Gear that > > has a very strict 3 months for new features schedule, that is usually > > fine for "established" apps but for something new you may very well find > > that there's that obvious feature missing that everyone needs and now y= ou > > can't add it until 3 months in the future. > >=20 > > Cheers, > >=20 > > Albert > >>=20 > >> Best regards > >>=20 > >> Plata > >>=20 > >> P.S.: CC me on the answers, I'm not subscribed