[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-release-team
Subject: Re: 2 kirigami fixes for a point release
From: Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date: 2020-02-18 20:37:48
Message-ID: 11465044.O9o76ZdvQC () xps
[Download RAW message or body]
El dimarts, 18 de febrer de 2020, a les 4:03:05 CET, Nate Graham va escriure:
> On 2020-02-16 14:43, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Maybe i explain myself wrongly, i'm not blaming distros at all.
> >
> > They made a decision, we/I may agree with them or not, that's *my/our* problem, \
> > what I was disagreeing is to us having to do extra work because someone elses \
> > (the distros) decision.
>
> We already do this: it's called the Plasma LTS product. :-) It's been
> specifically created to cater to various distros' desires for an
> extended-support product they can ship to users of their own LTS releases.
>
> But yes, I can also agree with more tests, better stability, moving to
> GitLab so tests are run before merging, etc. I think we can all agree
> with that.
>
> However all the autotests in the world will not resolve the fundamental
> incompatibility between the Plasma LTS product, which is built around
> the release model of extended, ongoing bugfix releases, and Frameworks,
> which is built around a rolling release model with no bugfix releases at
> all.
I still don't see why this is a problem, as said Plasma depends on a myriad of \
libraries that are building each with their own release model, most probably with no \
bugfix releases at all either.
Incidentally what happens is that those libraries are not buggy, and it seems the \
Plasma-facing parts of KF5 are, well, let's make them not be.
Cheers,
Albert
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic