From kde-release-team  Sun Feb 16 09:45:18 2020
From: Andreas Cord-Landwehr <cordlandwehr () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 09:45:18 +0000
To: kde-release-team
Subject: Re: New Framework Review: KDAV
Message-Id: <1988657.EBAABPJAd9 () weatherwax>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-release-team&m=158184632521283

On Sonntag, 16. Februar 2020 10:29:42 CET Volker Krause wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 February 2020 11:42:57 CET Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
> > Hi, sorry for this very late mail, missed the call for reviews...
> > 
> > Would it be possible to do some license clarifications before moving kdav
> > into the frameworks section?
> > 
> > In mostly all files it is not clear if the LGPL or the GPL is meant
> > (stating "GNU Library General Public License" and referring to the GPL
> > text at the end of the statement). This license statement is used for all
> > files except autotests/fakesever.cpp and autotests/fakeserver.h.
> > Luckily, from the copyright statements there are only 3 copyright holders:
> > Tobias, Sandro and Gregory. I put all 3 into CC.
> > 
> > @Tobias, Sandro, Gregory: Can you clarify that the code you are holding
> > copyright about in this repository is licensed according to
> > LGPL-2.0-or-later?
> 
> Thanks for checking!
> 
> We have relicensing approval to LGPL for those three already in https://
> mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/2019-September/042912.html (thread continues
> into the next month), so it's probably something I messed up while executing
> the relicensing :)

Great! Maybe the simplest way then is to directly replace all affected headers 
with the text "SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.0-or-later" and the ambiguity is 
gone :)

Cheers,
Andreas