[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: KDE Frameworks 5.56.0
From:       Luca Beltrame <lbeltrame () kde ! org>
Date:       2019-03-13 10:39:41
Message-ID: 20190313113941.273ade30 () dennogumi ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


Il giorno Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:18:24 +0100
Antonio Rojas <arojas@archlinux.org> ha scritto:

> I had to backport 4bf1d0e8 too for it to apply on top of 5.56. Would
> be good if some kirigami dev could confirm whether it's OK to
> backport just those 2 commits

I talked this over with notmart on IRC:

[11:32] <notmart> hmm, not much understanding why 4bf1d0e8 is needed
[11:32] <einar77_work> notmart: backporting one introduces conflicts
[11:32] <notmart> i tought the fix for the kcm freeze was done before
tagging, meh
[11:32] <notmart> right
[11:33] <notmart> so yeah, the other one is mostly harmless
[11:33] <notmart> i guess is better to backport those two instead of
making another one ad hoc?=20
[11:33] <einar77_work> I would say so

tl;dr: It should be harmless. Can we get a kirigami 5.56.1 with those
two commits in?

While we're here we might want a plasma-framework 5.56.1 with
ebae2d63033647950cf0f9d97410723a8c7db1f3 applied (which fixes a crash).

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]