[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Future frameworks releases
From:       Benjamin Reed <rangerrick () befunk ! com>
Date:       2015-06-08 15:21:56
Message-ID: 5575B314.9020609 () befunk ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On 6/8/15 11:02 AM, Eric Hameleers wrote:
> The only sane way forward is that every Frameworks release contains
> all Frameworks tarballs, regardless of updates since the previous
> public release. Every Framework should adhere to the overall version
> number. 

Yeah, this proposal makes no sense to me.  If you want to individually
manage a library with an independent numbering scheme, then shouldn't it
be a separate/external project?  The whole point of the "framework" is
to provide a monolithic thing that has everything you need.

-- 
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick a.k.a. Raccoon Fink
Open Source and Mac OS X development

Blog: http://me.raccoonfink.com/
Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/



["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]