[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle
From:       Alexander Neundorf <neundorf () kde ! org>
Date:       2014-04-30 19:39:36
Message-ID: 8148063.BtWvY9hpZU () tuxedo ! neundorf ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 10:17:23 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2014 23:20:21 Lisandro Dami=E1n Nicanor P=E9rez Meyer=
 wrote:
> > The result will be that we will need to freeze at some point and do our
> > best to keep up with patches for stable releases. Or maybe even drop KF5
> > for stable releases :-/
> =

> While I don't share the fatalistic point of Lisandro, I do agree that it
> brings potential problems. I do also expect a Debian to ship with a very
> patched-up set of KF5 packages.
> =

> At freeze/stabilization point in at least Debian it is a time of 'bugfixes
> only, no new dependencies and features'. For a large collection of softwa=
re
> on many architectures, a longer stabilization period is needed.
> =

> Especially with all the KF5 bits is versioned bound to each others (so th=
at
> to fix a bug in one component, you need to update *everything* - =


are you assuming that or is this indeed the case ?
Do all frameworks depend on the same version of all other frameworks, or do =

they have specific required versions ?

Alex

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]