[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: adding kwebkitpart to KDE SC
From:       Dawit A <adawit () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-06-15 16:35:12
Message-ID: CALa28R4zMXZiA1sggVvrG=W0=Tv1k=_TxkiBAH3rNisOycX5GA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, David Faure <faure@kde.org> wrote:

> On Thursday 29 March 2012 18:33:46 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dijous, 29 de mar=C3=A7 de 2012, a les 12:10:06, David Faure va escr=
iure:
> > > On Wednesday 28 March 2012 19:38:25 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > The technical point of view is not enough to guarantee something
> being
> > > > part
> > > > of  the KDE SC, otherwise i could argue the same thing (don't want =
to
> > > > have
> > > > ugly KDE_VERSION around) for some obscure program only I would use.
> > >
> > > Hmm? This is about a crucial component for konqueror, not about some
> > > obscure program.
> >
> > Why did it went to extragear if it was a crucial component?
>
> Things evolve over time. kwebkitpart works much better than it used to,
> and on
> the other hand, khtml isn't catching up much with today's web. Do you
> really
> want to have a full khtml vs kwebkitpart debate here, or can we just go o=
n
> with "treating both equally, shipping both and letting users choose"?
>
> Dirk wrote:
> > The scripts are as usual in /trunk/kde-common/release,
> > and "dirk reads this" :-)
>
> Hehe. So all we need to do is ensure kwebkitpart has a KDE/4.8 branch and
> then
> add it to modules.git, right? Well at this point it might be a bit late f=
or
> adding to 4.8.4 all of sudden, so maybe we want to do this for 4.9 -- but
> then
> it means someone needs to remember to add it to modules.git at the exact
> right
> moment (after the last 4.8.x release and before the first 4.9.0 alpha)?


Hmm... would it be too late to do this now since we are on 4.9.0 beta-2
already ?

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, David Faure <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:faure@kde.org" \
target="_blank">faure@kde.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">

On Thursday 29 March 2012 18:33:46 Albert Astals Cid wrote:<br>
&gt; El Dijous, 29 de març de 2012, a les 12:10:06, David Faure va escriure:<br>
&gt; &gt; On Wednesday 28 March 2012 19:38:25 Albert Astals Cid wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; The technical point of view is not enough to guarantee something \
being<br> &gt; &gt; &gt; part<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; of   the KDE SC, otherwise i could argue the same thing (don&#39;t \
want to<br> &gt; &gt; &gt; have<br>
&gt; &gt; &gt; ugly KDE_VERSION around) for some obscure program only I would \
use.<br> &gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Hmm? This is about a crucial component for konqueror, not about some<br>
&gt; &gt; obscure program.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Why did it went to extragear if it was a crucial component?<br>
<br>
Things evolve over time. kwebkitpart works much better than it used to, and on<br>
the other hand, khtml isn&#39;t catching up much with today&#39;s web. Do you \
really<br> want to have a full khtml vs kwebkitpart debate here, or can we just go \
on<br> with &quot;treating both equally, shipping both and letting users \
choose&quot;?<br> <div class="im"><br>
Dirk wrote:<br>
&gt; The scripts are as usual in /trunk/kde-common/release,<br>
&gt; and &quot;dirk reads this&quot; :-)<br>
<br>
</div>Hehe. So all we need to do is ensure kwebkitpart has a KDE/4.8 branch and \
then<br> add it to modules.git, right? Well at this point it might be a bit late \
for<br> adding to 4.8.4 all of sudden, so maybe we want to do this for 4.9 -- but \
then<br> it means someone needs to remember to add it to modules.git at the exact \
right<br> moment (after the last 4.8.x release and before the first 4.9.0 \
alpha)?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hmm... would it be too late to do this now \
since we are on 4.9.0 beta-2 already ?  </div></div><br>



_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic