[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Re: ALERT: KDElibs (at least) 4.8.4 is actually 4.8.80+
From:       Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4=DFlin?= <mgraesslin () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-06-10 19:17:14
Message-ID: 2765409.oNBMmfePAH () martin-desktop
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Sunday 10 June 2012 20:49:51 Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 10.06.2012 20:33, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Feel free to wait until the packages are released publicly. That
> > way you'll have packages that work
> 
> [...]
> 
> > There is not a single untested tarball in any semipublic site.
> > There are untested tarballs in a private site.
> 
> I think these two answers summarize nicely albeit with a very sad
> outcome what QA means to KDE.
I'm quite surprised to hear that from a downstream. I think as a downstream 
you should be aware of the steps currently undertaken by the KDE community to 
improve the situation. And many of these steps have been discussed also on 
this mailinglist - e.g. using Jenkins to generate and build the tarballs. I'm 
quite sure our sysadmins would appreciate help from an experienced downstream 
developer :-)

Given the current efforts on QA, I find your comment not helpful - neither for 
KDE, nor for you as a downstream.

As Albert already pointed out this is a "we" and we should work together and 
not against each other.

Cheers
Martin Gräßlin
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]