[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: 4.8.80 is out
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-06-06 22:44:27
Message-ID: 3309102.Scul68fnmR () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 19:37:48, Nicol=E1s Alvarez va escriu=
re:
> 2012/6/6, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>:
> > El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 23:09:05, Dirk Mueller va escriur=
e:
> >> On Wednesday 06 June 2012, Nicol=E1s Alvarez wrote:
> >> > > Could you please double check that you tagged the KDE/4.9 branch on
> >> > > all
> >> > > related modules with the release tag?
> >> > =

> >> > There is no 4.9 branch in kdelibs. At least not yet.
> >> =

> >> Ah, d'oh. okay, that explains it.
> >> =

> >> Well, now we have the mess completed. IMHO we should create a KDE/4.9 =
and
> >> move Sebastian Truegs nepomuk branch merge there. then we can also bump
> >> the
> >> Qt requirements.
> > =

> > Why should we move it there? He commited it to KDE/4.8 so he wants it
> > there, right?
> =

> Where else could he have committed?! There is no master, there is no
> 4.9. If I wanted something to be in 4.9 but not in 4.8.4, what option
> do I have?

None.

kdelibs is feature frozen, you can't want to have anything in 4.9 but not i=
n =

4.8.4 by the kdelibs state definition, kdelibs will be renamed to 4.9 just =
for =

naming sake but it is still kdelibs 4.8 and it is still kdelibs 4.7, *only* =

bugfixes should go there.

And yes, you might disagree, but it is what we agreed back then when the =

freeze was put in place.

Albert
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]