El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 13:45:34, Scott Kitterman va escriure:
> Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> wrote:
> >El Dimarts, 29 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:37, Kevin Kofler va
> >
> >escriure:
> >> On Tuesday 29 May 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >> > Blame the soprano developers and the nepomuk developers for not
> >
> >respecting
> >
> >> > the dependency freeze.
> >> 
> >> Oh by the way, this is not the first time a prerelease of the KDE SC
> >
> >depends
> >
> >> on a git snapshot of Soprano, either (sadly). So it's not so big a
> >> catastrophe to warrant canceling the entire release!
> >
> >I'm the release dude now, I've decided I don't want to release tarballs
> >that
> >depend on something that does not exist.
> >
> >You can volunteer if you don't like how I'm doing the work and let the
> >rest of
> >the release team decide who they want doing the job.
> 
> Thank you for the team oriented approach to your work on KDE. I find it very
> motivational.

Please do not confuse team work with democracy. I like team work, I do take 
suggestions, but at the end each person in a team has a given role and a given 
attributions for that role, the release dude does the releases.

And as release dude I've decided I don't want to release Beta 1 depending on 
unreleased packages.

Being the release dude is something i did not want to do, but we had to make a 
release and noone was there to do them.

Cancelling the Beta 1 is something i did not want to do, but I do sincerely 
think that releasing depending on unexsisting stuff is a bad idea.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Scott K
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team