[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: adding kwebkitpart to KDE SC
From:       Albert Astals Cid <tsdgeos () yahoo ! es>
Date:       2012-05-04 23:25:26
Message-ID: 1336173926.14281.YahooMailClassic () web132206 ! mail ! ird ! yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

--- El s=E1b, 5/5/12, David Faure <faure@kde.org> escribi=F3:

> De: David Faure <faure@kde.org>
> On Thursday 29 March 2012 18:33:46
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dijous, 29 de mar=E7 de 2012, a les 12:10:06, David
> Faure va escriure:
> > > On Wednesday 28 March 2012 19:38:25 Albert Astals
> Cid wrote:
> > > > The technical point of view is not enough to
> guarantee something being
> > > > part
> > > > of=A0 the KDE SC, otherwise i could argue
> the same thing (don't want to
> > > > have
> > > > ugly KDE_VERSION around) for some obscure
> program only I would use.
> > > =

> > > Hmm? This is about a crucial component for
> konqueror, not about some
> > > obscure program.
> > =

> > Why did it went to extragear if it was a crucial
> component?
> =

> Things evolve over time. kwebkitpart works much better than
> it used to, and on =

> the other hand, khtml isn't catching up much with today's
> web. Do you really =

> want to have a full khtml vs kwebkitpart debate here or can
> we just go on =

> with "treating both equally, shipping both and letting users
> choose"?

Dawit proposed a patch that does not treat both of them equally.

Cheers,
  Albert
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]