From kde-release-team  Mon Dec 26 21:20:52 2011
From: Harry Miller <phobos_anomaly () yahoo ! com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 21:20:52 +0000
To: kde-release-team
Subject: Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
Message-Id: <1324934452.34386.YahooMailClassic () web111807 ! mail ! gq1 ! yahoo ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-release-team&m=132493460206193
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============6563497508354235044=="

--===============6563497508354235044==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1255137725-1955559901-1324934452=:34386"

--1255137725-1955559901-1324934452=:34386
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hi, 

I've built kde 4.7.95 against qt 4.8 and haven't had any issues. Infact, it ran a little faster and a lot more reliably when built against 4.8 than it ever did for me against 4.7.4. I didn't use any patches either. I wasn't aware that there was one, let alone that it was needed. 

Good luck. 

--- On Mon, 12/26/11, Phil Miller <philm@chakra-project.org> wrote:

From: Phil Miller <philm@chakra-project.org>
Subject: Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
To: "KDE release coordination" <release-team@kde.org>
Date: Monday, December 26, 2011, 9:21 AM

KDE has some issues with qt-4.8.0.

One of it is regarding QUrl.toLocalfile:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749213

Patching qt with followed patch fixes it:

qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0-QUrl_toLocalFile.patch

Does anybody else has issues with KDE 4.7.95 build against qt-4.8.0 or would 
it be better to build the next RC against qt-4.7.4 again?
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

--1255137725-1955559901-1324934452=:34386
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><br>Hi, <br><br>I've built kde 4.7.95 against qt 4.8 and haven't had any issues. Infact, it ran a little faster and a lot more reliably when built against 4.8 than it ever did for me against 4.7.4. I didn't use any patches either. I wasn't aware that there was one, let alone that it was needed. <br><br>Good luck. <br><br>--- On <b>Mon, 12/26/11, Phil Miller <i>&lt;philm@chakra-project.org&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Phil Miller &lt;philm@chakra-project.org&gt;<br>Subject: Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)<br>To: "KDE release coordination" &lt;release-team@kde.org&gt;<br>Date: Monday, December 26, 2011, 9:21 AM<br><br><div class="plainMail">KDE has some issues with qt-4.8.0.<br><br>One of it is regarding QUrl.toLocalfile:<br><br><a
 href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749213" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749213</a><br><br>Patching qt with followed patch fixes it:<br><br>qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0-QUrl_toLocalFile.patch<br><br>Does anybody else has issues with KDE 4.7.95 build against qt-4.8.0 or would <br>it be better to build the next RC against qt-4.7.4 again?</div><br>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br><br><div class="plainMail">_______________________________________________<br>release-team mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:release-team@kde.org" href="/mc/compose?to=release-team@kde.org">release-team@kde.org</a><br><a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table>
--1255137725-1955559901-1324934452=:34386--

--===============6563497508354235044==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

--===============6563497508354235044==--